Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Fabric3 includes an extensible security framework that implements authentication and authorization. Authentication is typically specified as a policy intent on a binding to perform client, server, or mutual authentication. When a client is authenticated, a security subject is associated with messages sent by the client. This security subject can then be used to authorize access to service operations based on roles.

The security provider varies by runtime. The Standalone, Maven, and Ant runtimes are configured by default to use a basic security provider. The Tomcat runtime is configured with a provider that delegates to Tomcat security realms. There is also a Fabric3 extension that uses Spring Security, which can be installed in any of the Fabric3 runtimes.

Configuring The Basic Security Provider

The Standalone runtime includes a basic security provider that allows users and roles to be statically defined in a configuration file, security.xml, located in the runtime /config directory. An example file is shown below:

<users>
   <user>
      <username>foo</username>
      <password>bar</password>
      <roles>
         <role>role1</role>
         <role>role2</role>
      </roles>
   </user>
</users>

In the Maven runtime, the same security information is configured using a systemConfig entry:

<systemConfig>
   <\!\[CDATA\[
       <config>
          <users>
             <user>
                <username>foo</username>
                <password>bar</password>
             </user>
          </users>
       </config>
   \]\]>
</systemConfig>

Using Authentication and Authorization in Application Code

Authentication is typically enabled on a binding configuration. Please refer to the binding chapters for specific examples.

The Fabric3 API includes the org.fabric3.api.annotation.security.RolesAllowed annotation, which is used to specify roles required to execute a portion of code. The RolesAllowed annotation can be placed on a method or class (in which case it will be applied to all methods contained in the class) to restrict access to security subjects with certain roles as follows:

import org.fabric3.api.annotation.security.RolesAllowed;

public class SecureRolesServiceImpl implements SecureService {

   @RolesAllowed({"role1", "role2"})
   public void call() \{
      // ...
   }
}

Note that the current security subject can be injected using the SCA @Context annotation on a field or setter method that takes the SCA RequestContext type. Alternatively, additional security information including roles can be accessed by using the org.fabric3.api.Fabric3RequestContext type in place of the SCA RequestContext type.

import org.fabric3.api.Fabric3RequestContext;

public class SecureRolesServiceImpl implements SecureService {
   
   @Context
   protected Fabric3RequestContext context;
   
   public void call() \{
      SecuritySubject context.getCurrentSubject();
      String userName = context.getUsername();
      // iterate roles
      for (Role role: context.getRoles() {
          String roleName = role.getName();
      }
   }
}

Simulating Authentication in Integration Tests

In integration test environments, it is often required to simulate authentication credentials. For example, a test client may need to supply credentials to authenticate with the secure service it tests. Fabric3 JUnit test components can be configured with authentication credentials, and those credentials propagated over a remote transport such as Web Services. The following shows how to simulate username/password credentials:

<component name="SecurityTest">
   <f3:junit class="...">
      <configuration>
         <username>scott</username>
         <password>wombat</password>
      </configuration>
   </f3:junit>
   <reference name="service" target="SCASecureService"/>
</component>

Custom Security Providers

The basic provider can be replaced by a more capability (and dynamic) alternative by substituting the fabric3-security-impl.jar in the extensions repository. For details on implementing an alternative provider, see the Javadoc for the org.fabric3.spi.security package in fabric3-spi.